at 'Knowledge - Common Heritage, Not Private Property'
14.00 - 17.15 Sunday 10 November 2002
University of London Union, Malet St, London WC1
A discussion
meeting organised by Scientists for Global
Responsibility
and supported by the UK National Commission for UNESCO.
![]()
Dr Nicholas Maxwell is a
philosopher at University College, London. He is author of the
book 'From Knowledge to Wisdom' and of numerous articles relating
to knowledge, wisdom, science and the public good, including
'What Kind of Inquiry Can Best Help Us Create a Good World?' He
will speak on
Science, Knowledge and the Public
Good
Nicholas Maxwell argues that the orthodox view of the basic aims
of science is untenable. First, there are metaphysical
presuppositions implicit in the aims of science: science cannot
proceed without making some kind of assumption concerning the
comprehensibility of the universe. Second, values (of one kind or
another) are inevitably built into the aims of science: science
does not just seek truth as such - it seeks truth that is
important, of value. Thirdly, granted that science seeks to
improve knowledge, there are important questions about WHOSE
knowledge and understanding science ought ultimately be concerned
to improve.
Dr Mae Wan Ho is Director
of the Institute of Science in Society, and initiator of the
draft convention. She writes, broadcasts and addresses meetings
frequently on the social aspects of genetic engineering. She will
speak on
An Introduction to the Convention on
Knowledge
The new trade-related intellectual property regime in
industrialised nations is an unprecedented privatisation of
knowledge, which has encouraged the biopiracy of indigenous
knowledge and resources on a global scale. This regime is being
imposed on the rest of the world through the World Trade
Organisation. This drive towards economic globalisation is widely
acknowledged to be the major cause of poverty, social
disintegration and environmental degradation over the past
decades. It is obstructing attempts to implement a global agenda
for sustainability. We need a collective vision that could
underpin a new model of world governance and finance. To that
end, Mae Wan Ho has initiated, and INES, ISIS, SGR, Tebtebba and
TWN have refined and supported, some elements of a 'convention on
knowledge' that could serve as the focus of a concerted campaign
to reclaim all knowledge systems to the service of the public
good.
Dr Philip Webber is
Vice-chair of SGR, Chair of the Martin Ryle Trust and Head of the
Kirklees Environment Unit, West Yorkshire, a leading UK
environment policy and projects unit. He has co-authored numerous
books and articles on defence and environmental policy and has
recently participated as SGR spokesperson in Radio 4's "You and
Your's" debate on key issues in science. He will present
A Report on the Feedback that SGR has
Received to Date on the Draft Convention
SGR and its partner organisations started to publicise the draft
Convention on Knowledge earlier this year, and invited comments.
Philip Webber will present, for SGR, a summary of the comments
that have been received, which include a detailed commentary from
Prof Noam Chomsky.
Dr Jon Goulding is
a molecular biologist at Imperial College, London. He is
part of the team setting up the SGR website on vested interests in science.
He will speak on
Science and vested interests
Vested interests wield considerable influence in science. Whilst in some
cases such influences are obvious, in many more they are less so. SGR has
recently started putting together a website detailing examples of vested
interests in science. The talk will cover aspects of this, with an emphasis
on the patenting of genes and sequence fragments, and also the field of
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).
|
|
To Announcement of the Knowledge Meeting Send correspondence about the web-site to webmanager@sgr.org.uk This page last updated: 21 November 2002 © SGR 1997-2002 |