Web version of a press release issued on 4th August 2006 by SGR
Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) [1] today welcomed the call by Lord Rees, President of the Royal Society, for a massive expansion in energy R&D, but argued that much of the new funding needed could be diverted from military coffers.
In an editorial in today's Science journal [2], Lord Rees made the case that government-funded energy R&D in the G8 countries needed to be massively expanded if we are to tackle the key issues of climate change and energy security. He argued that such funding could be raised through measures such as carbon taxes.
However, SGR argues that much of this extra funding could come by redirecting some of the massive resources currently earmarked for military activities. Given that many of the current and future global security concerns are related to energy from the sourcing of fossil fuels in unstable countries and the security of nuclear power facilities to the global threat of climate change SGR believes that reducing the huge G8 military budgets and using the finance gained to expand sustainable energy would offer much better value for money.
SGR's case is further strengthened by the considerable imbalance between the funding for government military R&D and that for energy R&D. Latest figures suggest that the G7 governments spend ten times as much on military R&D than energy R&D [3].
Dr Stuart Parkinson, Director of SGR, said: “Lord Rees is right to call for a massive increase in publicly-funded energy research in the G8 to tackle climate change and energy security. But with such a large amount of R&D resources currently being used by the military, there is a strong case for a significant proportion of these to be diverted.”
Notes:
To Press Releases IndexFor
further information please contact Send
correspondence about
the web-site to webmanager@sgr.org.uk |
|||